Sunday, March 11, 2012

"Women present atypically."

A recent study got a bit of press, and it got me to thinkin'. Specifically, it got me to thinking about those clinicians who  say stuff like "Women typically present atypically," and stuff like that. Like they're a whole other species when it comes to matters of the heart.

Now, I was going to go through the results, look at the past literature, put things in context... Boring! The heck with that - I'm going in a different direction.

I figure that if women are so different from men when it comes to ACS, then they must have different symptoms with a bunch of other diseases as well. Right?  So here goes!


Pancreatitis
Why don't we talk about how men and women present differently with pancreatitis? Both the heart and the pancreas are visceral organs, with indirect transmission of nociception, and are subject to hormonal influence. Although there is a clear divide in etiology based on gender (men drink, women get gallstones), there doesn't appear to be any difference in the symptoms.

Extensive Pubmed and Google searches turned up only one somewhat relevant paper. Unfortunately, they only studied the relationship of patient gender to disease severity, and made no comments about symptoms at presentation.

Bottom line: Absolutely no data in the literature, on way or another. Anybody need a research project?

Pulmonary embolism
So, just like MI, this is a bad one to miss. Just like the heart, the symptoms can be protean and vague, and hormones like estrogen are often implicated. Should be a slam-dunk for a difference in symptoms!

Swiss researchers combined the results of 3 prospective trials, looking at the clinical presentation of 3414 outpatients with suspected PE. When they looked at the all the data, they found that, apparently, women and men presented with about the same symptoms (small exception - men more often had a concomitant symptomatic DVT). Warning - big slug of data here:


Note that men and women both had chest pain at about the same rate - very reassuring! There are some small differences, but aside from DVT symptoms, nothing is statistically significant. In addition, both the Wells and Geneva scores showed comparable performance in both genders.

Bottom line: It's only one paper, but it has a great design.

Stroke
Along with STEMIs and major trauma, stroke is one of the big three time-dependent, resource-intensive, emergency medicine priorities. Now, given that the history and physical exam are so crucial in our evaluation of tPA candidates, it would be good to know if we had to adjust our diagnosis to the gender of the patient. There have been 3 recent studies, with different methods, that all speak to this issue.

Looks sort of sketchy, right? Stuffed animals, adult woman... (source)
Lisabeth 2009 used interviews, asking the patient what symptoms had brought them to the hospital. These interviews were conducted after admission, but despite the potential for recall bias, few differences were found: Only "mental status change" rose to (marginal) significance.


Gargano 2009 was also performed in Michigan, but used registry data from almost two thousand admissions. Instead of interviewers, they abstracted data from ED documentation.


There appear to be few significant differences between the sexes here. Men having slightly more "balance/dizziness" problems than women, which seemed to drive the marginal difference in "Any warning sign or suspect stroke." Even the authors concede that:
 "Overall, the sex differences in symptoms we identified were relatively minor..." 
A Tasmanian study, Gall 2010, also showed some minor differences, but nothing clinically significant.
Women were significantly less likely to have dysarthria, ataxia, or paresthesia at stroke onset than men, but more often had incontinence, loss of consciousness, visual deficits, and dysphasia. ...  Despite sex differences in the prevalence of signs and symptoms, the ranking of the top 5 symptoms was similar for men and women.
Bottom line: Minor differences, of little clinical significance across a number of sites and study designs. Here, at least, men act like women. Or the other way around.

Appendicitis
No only is the hormonal milieu different in this case, but the anatomy as well! With all the added adnexa & "stuff," the differential diagnosis is expanded, and the evaluation, and especially imaging choices, can be quite different for the boys and the girls.

And cylons.  Cylons definitely have atypical presentations.
So it's reasonable to think that the presenting symptoms would be significantly different as well. I only found 2 studies that fit the bill, however, and they have some disappointing shortcomings.

Guss 2000 looked at 196 ED patients who ended up with a diagnosis of appendicitis. Now this is the funny thing - the women had longer diagnostic work-ups before operation, but the men had higher rates of perforation. Apparently, though, they presented in much the same manner:

Oddly, there is no mention of RLQ tenderness here. Although the methods described how tenderness at McBurney's point was to be included, no mention is made in the results. Strange omission...

A similar study was done by McGann-Donlan 2009, comparing 137 men and women, by chart review, who had received a diagnosis of appendicitis. Rather than a surgical diagnosis, the CT scan was taken to be the "gold standard" of diagnosis. (By contrast, only 3 patients in Guss 2000 had CTs!)


Hmm, shouldn't there be some p's kicking around? Perhaps a SD or two, or even, heaven forfend, some confidence interval? Ah, no. Let me quote (italics from the original):
Females more commonly had nausea (66% of females vs 43% of males), vomiting (37% of females vs 32% of males), and diarrhea (18% of females vs 7% of males). Females less commonly had RLQ (right lower quadrant) pain (77% of females vs 88% of males) and fever (1.5% of females vs 7% of males). There was no difference in anorexia between genders (29% of females vs 30% of males)
Apparently italics are the new p-value. Brady, did you already know this?

Now, the problem with these two studies is that they only looked at patients with diagnosed appendicitis - they didn't look at patients with suspected appendicitis.

Eskelinen 1994 took a whole other approach. They collected data prospectively from over a thousand patients presenting with abdominal pain (not just those with confirmed appys), and tried to construct gender-specific prediction models (unlike, e.g., the MANTRELS score). Through multivariate analysis they determined the independent predictive elements for men and women. The elements in the "B" column are the regression coefficients - the higher the number, the higher the weight that element contributes to the score. Comparing men % women, we find:

Well, it looks like RLQ pain is the most important element for both genders. Most of the other symptoms washed out of both models - migration, intensity, anorexia, etc.

Bottom line - There appears to be no consistent, clinically significant difference between the genders in appendicitis.

Lyme
On one hand, you wouldn't expect Borrelia to show up differently in men & women, since it's a freakin' bacteria. What does it know?

That's how B. burdorferi rolls.

On the other hand, this disease was first diagnosed in CT after one mother insisted that her child's disease that was being misdiagnosed. Since that dynamic (i.e. doctor vs lay-woman) is part & parcel of the Lyme disease history, you might expect some gender-based analysis in the literature.

Bingo.


"Sex differences in the clinical and serologic presentation of early Lyme disease" supposedly demonstrates that both women and men have similar symptoms in early Lyme, but have different immune responses. I'm not going to use this paper to prove any points, for a few reasons.


First, the lead author is employed at the Lyme Disease Research Foundation, which is an organization founded & run by the last author, Aucott. In other words, the last author is the boss of the first author.

Boss? Time for a gratuitous picture of my hero!
Second. it's kind of a crap paper. All the Lyme symptoms were diagnosed by 1 doctor - Dr. Aucott.

Last, it has an agenda. Many proponents of "chronic Lyme" believe current immunologic techniques of diagnosing Lyme disease do not work. (This notion, by the way, has no support from people who actually did fellowships in ID.) The paper here will likely be used to suggest that such tests discriminate against women, even in early disease. They're using the shield of "gender-based medicine" to advance their chronic Lyme agenda. For example:


(The lead author, Stricker, has had an article retracted from the NEJM for falsifying data. Not a trustworthy doctor. Nowadays he's an expert on Morgellons.)

Okay, now I'm ranting. Time to wrap this up!

Conclusion
Whatever your take on the cardiology literature is, I found little evidence that demonstrated that women evince significantly different symptoms than men in a number of other acute diseases.

4 comments:

  1. I have being on blog Sites for a while now and today I felt like I should share my story because I was a victim too. I had HIV for 6 years and i never thought I would ever get a cure I had and this made it impossible for me to get married to the man I was supposed to get married to even after 2 years of relationship he broke up with me when he finds out I was HIV positive. So I got to know about Dr. Itua on Blog Site who treated someone and the person shared a story of how she got a cured and let her contact details, I contacted Dr. Itua and he actually confirmed it and I decided to give a try too and use his herbal medicine that was how my burden ended completely. My son will be 2 soon and I am grateful to God and thankful to his medicine too.Dr Itua Can As Well Cure The Following Disease…Alzheimer’s disease,Bechet’s disease,Crohn’s disease
    ,Cushing’s disease,Heart failure,Multiple Sclerosis,Hypertension,Colo_Rectal Cancer,Lyme Disease,Blood Cancer,Brain Cancer,Breast Cancer,Lung Cancer,Kidney Cancer, HIV, Herpes,Hepatitis B, Liver Inflammatory,Diabetes,Fibroid, Get Your Ex Back, If you have (A just reach him on drituaherbalcenter@gmail.com / info@drituaherbalcenter.com Or Whatsapp Number.+2348149277967)He can also advise you on how to handle some marital's issues. He's a good man.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 𝙊𝙧𝙖𝙡 𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙥𝙚𝙨 𝙞𝙨 𝙖 𝙗𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙫𝙞𝙧𝙪𝙨, 𝘽𝙪𝙩 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙞𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙗𝙡𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙮𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚!
      𝙈𝙨. 𝙏𝘼 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘼𝙐𝙎𝙏𝙍𝘼𝙇𝙄𝘼 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙜𝙣𝙤𝙨𝙚𝙙 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙖𝙡 𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙥𝙚𝙨 𝙩𝙮𝙥𝙚1 (𝙃𝙎𝙑1), 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙨𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙝𝙤𝙨𝙚 # 𝙙𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙪𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙗𝙖𝙡𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙚@gmail.𝙘𝙤𝙢 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙨𝙝𝙚 𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙙 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙙 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝘿𝙧 𝙐𝙩𝙪 𝙤𝙣 𝙖 𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙪𝙢. 𝘼𝙛𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙛𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙬𝙚𝙚𝙠𝙨 𝙢𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙨𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙩𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙣𝙚𝙜𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙝𝙨𝙫1. 𝘼𝙛𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙤𝙣𝙮 𝙄 𝙜𝙖𝙫𝙚 𝙞𝙩 𝙖 𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙩𝙚𝙡𝙮 𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙚𝙙

      Delete
  2. I was diagnosed as HEPATITIS B carrier in 2013 with fibrosis of the
    liver already present. I started on antiviral medications which
    reduced the viral load initially. After a couple of years the virus
    became resistant. I started on HEPATITIS B Herbal treatment from
    ULTIMATE LIFE CLINIC (www.ultimatelifeclinic.com) in March, 2020. Their
    treatment totally reversed the virus. I did another blood test after
    the 6 months long treatment and tested negative to the virus. Amazing
    treatment! This treatment is a breakthrough for all HBV carriers.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I’d recommend using Dr. Utu Herbal Cure topically for instant pain and itch relief as well as accelerated healing of lesions and permanently stopping oral and genital herpes virus outbreaks. I have tried just about everything from acyclovir suppressive therapy to different natural oils, extracts, and other natural methods, some of which are EXTREMELY painful and exacerbate the problem (i.e. apple cider vinegar!). While vitamin E oil and suppressive therapy worked well for me, when I became pregnant I went back to trying to find a herbal cure. I was using vitamin E oil topically for a while but it was thin and difficult to use and only seemed to prevent further outbreaks rather than getting rid of it. I contacted Dr. Utu Herbal Cure through my friend. To my amazement, I could tell my outbreak was starting to heal within only a few hours! No more itching and pain! Dr. Utu Herbal Cure that I used was liquid herbs in bottles, so it was very easy to use. It simply whiffs, but it works so I don’t care! The best part of my testimony was that I successfully delivered a herpes-free beautiful daughter without further medications. Anyone who has tried Dr. Utu Herbal Cure knows just how rapidly those medications can add up. So give it a try! Anyone can reach Dr. Utu through
    drutuherbalcure@gmail.com
    +2349072733661

    ReplyDelete